This Website Uses Cookies By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy.学到更多该网站需要某些cookie工作并使用其他cookie来帮助您获得最佳体验。通过访问此网站,已经设置了某些cookie,您可能会删除和阻止。通过关闭此消息或继续使用我们的网站,即表示您同意使用cookie。访问我们的更新隐私和饼干政策,以了解更多信息。
An Oct. 20 decision of the Colorado Court of Appeals promises serious consequences to the local construction industry as well as its liability carriers.
As is widely known to the Colorado construction industry, the number of new condominium projects being developed in metropolitan Denver and elsewhere in the state is few. The reason is largely attributable to lawsuits against condo developers, designers and contractors. It is no secret that many new apartment projects are being designed with the prospect that once those lawsuits can no longer be brought, they will be converted into condo units and sold. Under Colorado law, construction defect suits cannot be brought more than six years after substantial construction completion (with few exceptions).In an attempt to solve the problem, a
A Colorado electrical contractor appears to have had a shocking experience in its efforts to collect more than $600,000 due it for electrical work on a lower downtown Denver condominium project. Appropriately, the name of the electrical contractor was Sure-Shock Electric Inc. Not having been paid, Sure-Shock filed a mechanic’s lien describing the entire project, but it served only the required 10-day notice on the owner of seven unsold units. Because there was an arbitration requirement in its contract, Sure-Shock arbitrated the question of how much it was owed and then proceeded to court for a determination of the validity
There are currently about 15,000 apartment units but only 300 condominium units under construction in metropolitan Denver. Why? The answer is simple: Homeowners association lawsuits.For several decades there has been a cottage industry composed of lawyers, engineers, architects and homeowner association management companies who have collaborated in bringing lawsuits against condominium developers, design professionals and contractors claiming defects in design and construction. Some of those lawsuits have been meritorious, some borderline and others without foundation.The result of these lawsuits has been to discourage developers, design professionals and contractors from doing any new condominium projects, despite what many believe to be
For years, Colorado property owners, as well as banks and other lenders that had deeds of trust (mortgages) on real estate, paid off or settled with subcontractors and suppliers who claimed mechanic’s liens against the properties involved. They made those payments because they thought, or were advised, that the mechanic’s liens had priorities over the deeds of trust. That is not necessarily true. Whether a particular mechanic’s lien has priority over a deed of trust requires careful factual and legal study. If a subcontractor’s or supplier’s mechanic's lien does not have priority over the deed of trust, the subcontractor or
A recent decision of the Colorado Court of Appeals in the case of “Stresscon Corporation v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of America” provides an insight into insurance coverage under a contractor’s comprehensive general liability insurance policy. While the decision may be reviewed by the Colorado Supreme Court at a later date, it does appear to express the law as it now stands in Colorado. In the case, Stresscon fabricated concrete structural members that were being installed on the project when a panel fell, one workman was killed and another injured. Travelers, Stresscon’s comprehensive general liability insurance carrier, refused to defend